2017 Fantasy Baseball Draft Prep: Overdrafting Trea Turner causes him to land in Busts 2.0
With this being the second version of this column, it only seems right to start with the holdovers from the. The first thing you’ll notice is that there are far more pitchers that I’m sticking with. We’ll fix that in 2.0, but focusing mostly on hitters.
These players are still being drafted too early and I can’t imagine I’ll have any exposure to them in 2017.
Now to be clear, someone landing on my bust list doesn’t necessarily mean I think they’re going to be awful. Sometimes I just think their ADP is absurd and they’re so unlikely to justify it that their bust potential goes through the roof. That’s a fine introduction for the first new player on this list.
It seems pretty simple. Turner had 324 PA in 2016. Just double those numbers and you get a fair expectation for his 2017. By that method he’d hit 26 home runs, steal 66 bases and score 106 runs. Those numbers make his borderline-first round ADP seem like a bargain. Those expectations are also completely unfair to Turner.
We did this same thing with the small sample sizes of
. It wasn’t fair then either.
Turner’s batting average should be expected to fall 30 to 50 points. While a .300 average is nothing to sneeze at, it’s a big drop from .342. It’s also just one of many stats that should regress. Turner hit 14 home runs in his last 871 minor league PA. I would be more surprised if he topped 20 this year than if he hit less than the 13 he hit in 2015. Fangraphs’ Steamer projects Turner for 40 SB. That seems like a fair expectation. His ceiling is higher, but it’s not his floor either.
Jean Segura’s 2016 (when he was the No. 12 hitter in Rotisserie) is the optimistic comp for Turner’s ‘17. To be clear, I think Turner will be much better this year (and likely every year after), but compared to Segura in 2016, I would expect less home runs and a worse average. Far more likely is a season like
had last year. Nunez performed like a fourth-round pick, which felt great last year because you got him off the waiver wire. It won’t feel as good if you spend a first-round pick for fourth round production.
experienced a power resurgence in 2016 that was too big to be explained by the league-wide surge. His 28 home runs and .196 ISO were his best since 2011. His .484 SLG percentage was his highest since 2009. I’m always skeptical of players repeating these types of outlier seasons, especially when they’re about to turn 35 years old.
While Kinsler’s HR/FB rate was in line with his batted ball profile, it’s just hard to believe that a guy who had lived in the five to eight range for HR/FB rate is can now be trusted to be league average or better again. And that’s huge, because with Kinsler’s career high 16.9 percent K rate he no longer helps in batting average without the extra home runs. His other major contribution was with his 117 runs, which we know is not sustainable.
Kinsler’s current ADP is in the sixth round. I can’t even consider him there with DJ LeMahieu (eighth round),
(10th round) and
(13th round) all being available so much later. Pedroia and Zobrist come with a lot of the same risks as Kinsler, but their price is far more reflective of those risks.
A lot of the words I just wrote about Kinsler could very easily apply to
. Like Kinsler, Longoria saw his power numbers go up across the board and had his best season since 2009. I think everyone would expect Longoria’s power would regress a little, and my biggest issue with that is power was about the only thing special about him in 2016. Third base is especially deep in 2017 and it’s hard to see a path to standing out for Longoria.
His eighth round ADP isn’t awful, other than the fact he may need to play 160 games again to justify that cost. While he’s done that each of the past four seasons, I wouldn’t count on it happening again. The downside at this cost is as simple as him returning to 2014 or 2015 form while also missing even a short period of time. That seems far more likely than him repeating last year’s numbers.
I often have to start writing these pieces before even I notice the pattern. But would you believe that
is over 30 years old and just set a career high with 40 home runs? Would you also believe that his strikeout rate also went up and if his power numbers regress even a little he’s going to have a hard time distinguishing himself?
The weird thing about Frazier is that his increase in HR/FB rate (19 percent) was accompanied by a drop in hard-contact rate (31.3 percent). That is almost certainly not sustainable. Of the 28 other hitters with at least a 19 percent HR/FB rate, none had a hard contact rate lower than Frazier’s. In fact, only three of the 28 were below 35 percent.
Frazier is being taken in the Ian Kinsler range, and frankly has as much bust potential (or more) than anyone on this list. He was essentially a worse version of
Yep, one more old dude who had his best power season in nearly a decade. The story for Ramirez is just a little bit different though. Ramirez excelled in 2016 by staying healthy and hitting behind
. One of those things definitely won’t happen again in 2016.
Last year was the first time since 2012 (and second since 2010) that Ramirez topped 520 PA. That had a huge impact on his Fantasy value. Had he played in the 106 games he’d averaged from 2013-15 we wouldn’t even be having this discussion. He’ll be at DH most of the year. That should help with injury prevention, but I have a really hard time betting on a 33 year-old with his injury history staying healthy.
The other issue is trying to duplicate those 111 RBI. The
Boston Red Sox
offense was due to regress even if it didn’t lose pieces. Losing Big Papi likely means a lot of lost RBI opportunities for
. Those lost RBI will hurt if you draft him in the 7th round, 30 sports ahead of someone like
I spend a lot of time doubting the
Toronto Blue Jays
apparent approach to pitching. Sometimes that works out (2016
) and sometimes it doesn’t (2016
). But the fact that Sanchez is now the only Blue Jays’ starter being drafted among the top 30 makes him an easy target.
Sanchez succeeded in 2016 by cutting down on home runs, increasing his Ks to a reasonable amount, illustrating better control and continuing to hold batters to a low BABIP. You might think he also did a good job of limiting hard contact, but he was pretty average in that regard. He once again outperformed his peripherals (3.55 FIP, 4.01 SIERA), but the Blue Jays have had quite a bit of success with that.
Even if you only project a small amount of ERA regression, it’s easy to see Sanchez succeeding with a mid-3s ERA if the innings keep increasing. Those innings will be a major point of consternation with the huge leap he took in 2016. That adds to his injury risk and that combined with expected regression screams bust. His reasonable ceiling is pretty close to where he’s being drafted.